Reach Us 44-7723-850004

Disorders of Immune-mediated Therapies

Ramel Jonsson*

National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.

*Corresponding Author:
Ramel Jonsson
National University Hospital of Iceland
Reykjavik, Iceland
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: October 05, 2021; Accepted Date: October 19, 2021; Published Date: October 25, 2021

Citation: Jonsson R (2021) Disorders of Immune-mediated Therapies. Acta Rheuma.Vol.8 No.5:3.

Visit for more related articles at Acta Rheumatologica


Immune-mediated Inflammatory Disorders (IMIDs) are a set of ailments with a wide range of clinical manifestations for which there are currently no treatments. They provide a striking example of how modern molecular and computational tools can be successfully applied to immunological target discovery and subsequent treatment development. They share similar pathogenetic aspects ('public' immune pathways), but they also have distinct pathways that define their clinical phenotype, age and sex distribution, tissue location, and therapy response profile, among other things. Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), the Spondyloarthritis (SpA) disease spectrum, connective tissue disorders, cutaneous inflammatory conditions (such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), asthma, and autoimmune neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis are all examples of IMIDs. As a result, they pose serious medical problems throughout the system. Furthermore, these diseases are frequently accompanied by a variety of co-morbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, metabolic and bone problems, and cognitive deficits, all of which have a negative influence on quality of life and mortality. We'll concentrate on immune-mediated and autoimmune rheumatic disorders since they're a good example of how far targeted disease therapy has progressed.

Patients with common chronic immune-mediated inflammatory illnesses such rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and psoriasis may benefit from infliximab and other Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors. However, between 20% and 55% of patients do not respond to these treatments, resulting in a lower quality of life and an increased risk of irreversible organ damage and impairment. There is a need for strategies to improve TNF inhibitor treatment. Immunogenicity, defined as an immunological response to a medicine that results in the development of antidrug antibodies, has been blamed for the lack of response to TNF inhibitors. Antibodies to TNF inhibitors and other biologic medications lower drug levels in the blood and are linked to side effects such infusion responses. Infliximab, a chimeric antibody, is more immunogenic than other TNF inhibitors, and antibody production occurs often during infliximab treatment.

The therapeutic arsenal for IMIDs has changed dramatically over the last two decades. We've progressed from the widespread use of broad-spectrum immune modulators to the usual use of very specific medicines, owing to advances in monoclonal and molecular biotechnology, as well as the use of highly targeted medicinal chemistry. We discuss the significant breakthroughs and lessons learned along the way to the creation of innovative immune-targeted therapies, as well as the next steps in this incredible adventure.

Glucocorticoids and a variety of other tiny chemical entities that were mostly adopted from other fields for their anti-proliferative or cell metabolic effects were heavily used in IMID therapies towards the end of the twentieth century. Glucocorticoids have been used to treat various IMIDs since the 1940s. They showed decreased therapeutic value over time, as well as significant toxicity in terms of bone, cardiovascular systems, and metabolic function, despite their versatility and effectiveness. Methotrexate, azathioprine, sodium aurothiomalate (gold salts), sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, D-penicillamine, and mycophenolate were among the other mainstay therapeutics; however, their clinical application was rarely well defined in terms of immune specificity, or indeed in terms of underlying disease pathogenesis. Due to a large adverse event burden, these drugs were used in sequence or in combination with extreme caution. Clinical outcomes were, by today's standards, modest at best—partial responder and non-responder populations were widespread, and remission was rare. Long-term impairment was, unfortunately, the norm among IMIDs.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Flyer image
journal indexing image

Share This Article